GitHub activity, linked to your issues.
Merged and open pull requests, cycle time, review latency, commits and throughput, over thirty days, ninety days or a year. Every pull request shows the issue it closes.
A merged PR carries its ticket, so the work in the repository and the work on the board are the same work. Nobody has to reconcile two lists at the end of the sprint.
The screen
Your engineering activity in one view.
Connect once with the GitHub app and the screen fills itself, with the time of the last update shown at the top. Every merged pull request shows the issue it closed, and contributors who are your employees appear by name rather than by handle.
your-org/platform · synced 57m ago
Every pull request shows the issue it closes.
Open the issue straight from the pull request.
Each pull request is linked to its issue from the start, so nothing needs matching up later.
- See the issue number on every merged pull request
- See contributors by name when they are your employees
- Watch the issue close by itself when the work merges
- Sprint points update automatically when linked issues close
- See when the data was last updated, and refresh it any time
See how long work waits for review.
Cycle time and review latency over thirty days, ninety days or a year, all from the same data.
- See merged and open pull requests, and merges per week
- Track the median time from open to merge
- Track the median time to a first review
- See throughput and commit volume week by week
- If there is not enough data for a median yet, you see a dash, never a made-up zero
Access
Who can do what.
Everyone on the team can see what shipped and open the issue behind any pull request. Connecting a repository affects the whole organisation, so only a small group can do it.
See the metrics and recent pull requests.
Jump from a pull request to the issue it closes.
Refresh the data and change the time window.
Connect the repository and decide what is tracked.
Admin is the highest role and is not limited by these permissions, so keep it to the few people who genuinely need it.
One pull request, start to finish
A pull request merged in an hour, and the issue closed itself.
The pull request named the issue it was for, and everything else followed on its own. The issue closed, the sprint counted the points, and the author showed up by name. Because your issues and your team already run in NearSync, none of it needed a second tool.
The pull request names the issue it closes, so the two are linked from the start.