The rings in the brief measure how you are working rather than what you produced. Four areas, three measures each.
The four areas
Momentum
How well you ship. Task velocity, consistency, punctuality.
The closest of the four to conventional output, and the one that moves most obviously when you have a good week.
Nexus
How well you connect. Knowledge sharing, peer recognition, connectivity.
Whether you are contributing to what other people know, whether colleagues are acknowledging your work, and how much of the organisation you actually interact with. This is the area that quietly separates somebody doing their job from somebody the team depends on.
Growth
How well you are growing. AI adoption, upskilling, feedback loops.
Whether you are using the tools available, learning, and both giving and receiving feedback.
Vitality
How well you sustain it. Focus time, wellness, culture.
Protected working time, breaks actually taken, and participation in the things that are not work. The counterweight to Momentum, and the area that catches somebody shipping hard and heading for a wall.
Two ways to see them
Two visualisations, and the choice is yours and persists.
Gauge draws each area as a set of arcs, like an instrument.
Cores draws them as breathing orbs.
They show identical data. Pick whichever you read faster.
The colours are not decorative. Each area has its own hue family: cobalt for Momentum, emerald for Nexus, violet for Growth, cyan for Vitality. These are the one place in the product that deliberately breaks the monochrome system and ignores your organisation's accent colour, because tinting all four the same colour would make them a decoration rather than a chart.
How the numbers work
Each measure is progress against a target, expressed as a percentage and capped at a hundred. Reaching the target fills the arc; exceeding it does not overflow.
That cap is the most important thing to understand about them. They are not a score you can maximise. A completed ring means you did the expected amount of a healthy thing, and there is nothing above it. Somebody at a hundred per cent on task velocity is not outperforming somebody at ninety-five in any way the rings are trying to express.
They update as you work. Completing a task credits Momentum without a page reload.
What they are genuinely useful for
Noticing an imbalance. Momentum full and Vitality empty for three weeks is a real pattern with a real ending, and it is nearly invisible from the inside.
Noticing a habit you have dropped. Nexus falling usually means you stopped writing things down, which is the sort of thing nobody notices until somebody asks where the documentation went.
A conversation starter. In a one-to-one, "your Vitality has been low all month" is a better opening than "how are things", because it is specific and it is about the work rather than about the person.
What they are not for
They are not a performance measure, and using them as one breaks them immediately.
Every one of the twelve is gameable by somebody who wants to game it, and several are heavily role-dependent. An engineer in a deep quarter and a salesperson in a busy one will produce very different pictures while both doing exactly their jobs.
They are not comparable between people. There is no ranking, and the absence is deliberate.
They do not know about your life. A fortnight of low Momentum during a house move is not a signal about anything.
The honest framing: these are a mirror, and mirrors are only useful to the person standing in front of them.
What moves them and what does not
A short and honest account, because the most common question is why a ring did not move.
Completing a task credits Momentum, immediately.
Writing something colleagues read, or being recognised by them, credits Nexus over days rather than instantly.
Using the assistant and the platform's tools credits Growth, which is why it is frequently the highest area for people who have adopted the product and the lowest for people using it as a filing cabinet.
Taking breaks and protecting focus time credits Vitality, which is the only area where doing less of something can move it up.
Nothing here credits for time spent in the application. Sitting on a screen is not measured, deliberately, because it is the easiest thing to measure and the least related to anything worth having.
Achievements
Beside the greeting sits a single ring rather than a row of medals. The arc shows how far through the catalogue you are, the centre shows earned against total, and your most recent badge sits in the middle. It opens your profile.
It was a row of six icons before, and compressing it was right. A row of medals communicates "here are some unlockable things", which is a fact about the system. A ring communicates progress, which is a fact about you.
The twelve measures
| Area | Measures |
|---|---|
| Momentum | Task velocity, consistency, punctuality |
| Nexus | Knowledge sharing, peer recognition, connectivity |
| Growth | AI adoption, upskilling, feedback loop |
| Vitality | Focus time, wellness, culture |
Each is progress against a target for the period it covers, so they answer "am I doing roughly the expected amount of this" rather than "how much did I do".
The targets are defaults rather than something each person negotiates, which means the rings are comparable with your own past and not with a colleague's present. Two people in different roles hitting the same target are not doing comparable amounts of work, and the rings do not claim otherwise.
Why they are deferred
The rings load a moment after the rest of the page.
That is intentional: twelve measures across four areas is the most expensive thing on the screen, and making the feed and the composer wait for it would mean the useful part of Home arrived last. So the rings queue behind everything else and fill in when they are ready.
A reasonable relationship with them
Look weekly, not daily. These move slowly by design, and daily checking produces noise.
Read the shape, not the numbers. Which area is low matters. Whether it is at sixty or sixty-five does not.
Act on one at a time. Four areas is enough to feel bad about and too many to fix.
Do not chase a full ring. The cap exists precisely so there is nothing to chase, and somebody optimising for full rings has stopped doing their job and started doing the measurement.
Did this answer your question?
No, ask a person